Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01442
Original file (MD04-01442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD04-01442

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040917. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041229. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/INVOL DIS (BOARD WAIVED) (MISCONDUCT) MINOR DISP INF, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.2.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I know that the discharge I received was unjust because the way that my 1 st Sergeant came about punishing me was unfair. Before I got out the military I was getting out on a medical dischargewhich was in process. During this process my 1 st Sgt told me that if you get in trouble one more time your medical discharge would be changed to other than honorable and I would lose my GI Bill which did happen when I was discharged. Why I said my discharge was unjust is as follow. During these last days while in the service, me and one of my fellow Marine. He and I usually goes home on holidays, 48 or 96. On this last time I received punishment which lead to this type discharge. On our way back to base me and my fellow Marine, pumped gas at a gas station. Neither one of us had cash on us, and they didn’t accept checks. So we had to go back to base and get some cash to go back and pay the clerk and get our ID’s back. When we got back to base, our unit was in the field. So we got permission from the rear duty NCO which we did to go back to pay this clerk. When we returned back to base my Sgt told me that my 1 st Sgt said we didn’t have permission to leave base. So following this UCMJ charge, I was denied getting out on medical reasons and received an (OTH) So I was discharged. I found out that my unit was disbanded after getting out. I feel that my discharge was unjust and I’m requesting it to be upgraded as requested”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                920526 - 920909  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920910               Date of Discharge: 950518

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 08 09
          Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rank: PFC                          MOS: 0311
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 3.5 (9)                       Conduct: 3.2 (9)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, AFEM, SSDR, UNM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 1
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/INVOL DIS (BOARD WAIVED) (MISCONDUCT) MINOR DISP INF, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.2.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930315:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disrespectful to 1 st Sgt Z_; violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Stole $420.00 from PFC M_’s secretary on 930204.
 Awarded forfeiture of $406.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to Pvt (forfeiture of $406.00 for one month and 14 days restriction and extra duty suspended for 6 months). Not appealed.
930324:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement with military authorities, academic failure, disenrollment from MOS training track 2542, and having access to classified materials revoked.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
930401:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from restriction muster.
         Award: Forfeiture of $407.00, restriction for 60 days. Not appealed.
941006:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Financial irresponsibility.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
941205:  Division Psychiatrist diagnosed the Applicant with a severe antisocial personality disorder. Recommended expeditious administrative separation.
941227:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Antisocial personality disorder and frequent involvement with military authorities.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
941227:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 0730, 941214 to 0730, 941215.
         Award: Forfeiture of $217.00, restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Not appealed.
950227:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from battalion formation.
         Award: Forfeiture of $223.00, restriction and extra duty for 14 days (forfeiture of $123 suspended for 6 months). Not appealed.
950322:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions and by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder as evidenced by evaluation by the Division Psychiatrist and NJPs in the service record.
950322:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and to submit a statement.
950322:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions and by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder.

950430:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 950510:  GCMCA [CG, 2d MARDIV] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions.

 950518:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement to PMO, stating his stereo was stolen; violation of UCMJ, Article 121 (2 specs): Wrongfully misappropriate a stereo valued at $350.00 and an amplifier valued at $100.00.
         Award: Forfeiture of $427.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to Pvt. No indication of appeal in the record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19950518 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. Administrative separation for misconduct takes precedence over separation for other pending reasons. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on five occasions for disrespect to a First Sergeant, unauthorized absences, false official statements, and stealing. The Applicant’s average conduct markings also fall below the standard required for honorable service. While he may feel that unfair treatment by his First Sergeant was a factor that contributed to his actions, the record clearly reflects his disregard for the requirements of military discipline and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an inequity or impropriety must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such inequity or impropriety is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.











Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days; Article 91, disrespect to a SNCO, Article 107, false official statements; and Article 121, larceny.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00607

    Original file (MD02-00607.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00607 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020329, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 910815 - 920210 COG Period of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01354

    Original file (MD04-01354.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 1997_Navy | ND97-01365

    Original file (ND97-01365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was no indication of an appeal in the record.960506: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offenses as evidenced by violations of the UCMJ, Article 89: Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer on 960415; Article 90: Willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer on 960415; Article 91, disrespect toward a third class petty officer on 950929; Article 92 (2 specs): Failure to...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00875

    Original file (MD99-00875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00875 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990609, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions, that the RE code be upgraded, and the reason for the discharge be changed to convenience of the government. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500615

    Original file (MD0500615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant's misconduct is clearly documented in four formal counseling entries for deficiencies in performance and conduct; six nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceedings for violations of the following articles of the UCMJ: 86 Unauthorized absence (4 total specifications), 91 Insubordinate conduct (5 total specifications), 92 Failure to obey order or regulation (5 total specifications), 111 Drunken driving, and 128 Assault; and two vacatings, due to continued misconduct, of portions of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01270

    Original file (MD02-01270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950223 - 950321 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950322 Date of Discharge: 990315 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 11 24 (Excludes lost time, confinement time and appellate leave.) PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19990315 with a bad conduct discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01029

    Original file (MD03-01029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01029 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030522. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600427

    Original file (ND0600427.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Partial relief based upon this impropriety is warranted.When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. ” The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00637

    Original file (MD01-00637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I appeal to the board for a discharge upgrade. The factual basis for this recommendation was minor disciplinary infractions, specifically, numerous violations of the UCMJ which resulted in him receiving NJP on four (4) separate occasions and two (2) counseling.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600025

    Original file (MD0600025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls well below that required for an upgrade. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on...